The Composition of Crime in Criminal Law of Some Foreign Countries and Differences with National Criminal Law

The article widely uses logical, inductive, deductive, systematic, logical-legal, comparative-legal research methods. In particular, the analysis and study of the issue of the importance of the composition of crime(structure of a crime) in countries such as Russia, Moldova, Germany, South Korea, and Australia, and compare it with our national legislation. Then as a result of the emergence of various theories and concepts about composition of crime, three main conceptual approaches to the doctrine of the composition of crime in criminal law theory were developed by representatives of the criminal law school: the concept of scientific abstraction of the composition of crime, the concept of real composition of crime and “the normative or legislative model” of the composition of crime. The analysis of the signs of the composition of crime. All characteristics of the composition of crime are divided into two groups of characteristics: objective signs – those that describe the crime in its external manifestation; subjective signs – those that describe the perpetrator of the crime and their mental attitude towards the act committed. Each group of characteristics consists of two elements, which combine certain features that characterize the crime from different perspectives. At the same time, the doctrine of criminal law and existing scientific research were analyzed, and reasonable theoretical recommendations were developed in this regard. At the same time, the theoretical and practical problems related to the composition of crime and its types were highlighted, and the results of the survey on the introduction of the norm related to the structure of the crime into the criminal legislation were reflected, and in this regard, specific proposals and recommendations were developed for improving the criminal legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan