Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

Nanoparticle‐Assisted Polymer Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Condition‐Specific Mechanisms, Modeling Reliability, and Field‐Scale Translation

R. VenkateshDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, SIMATS Chennai Tamil Nadu IndiaKuwar MausamDepartment of Mechanical Engineering GLA University Mathura Uttar Pradesh IndiaM. BrahmarajuDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering Pragati Engineering College Kakinada Andhra Pradesh IndiaKomal ParasharCentre of Research Impact and Outcome Chitkara University Rajpura Punjab IndiaSubrahmanya Ranjit PasupuletiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Aditya University Surampalem Andhra Pradesh IndiaMadhur GroverSharda School of Engineering and Sciences Sharda University Greater Noida Uttar Pradesh IndiaSagayaraj PappuMeenakshi College of Arts and Science Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research Chennai Tamil Nadu IndiaRamya MarananDivision of Research and Development Lovely Professional University Phagwara Punjab IndiaMadaminov Sanjarbek Maxmudjon UgliDepartment of Transport Systems Urgench State University Named After Abu Rayhan Biruni Urgench UzbekistanS. RajkumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Manufacturing, Institute of Technology Hawassa University Awassa Ethiopia
2026en
Ochiq kirishOltin

Litsenziya: cc-by

ABI

Annotatsiya

ABSTRACT Nanoparticle‐assisted polymer flooding (NAPF) is increasingly investigated as a hybrid chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) strategy because nanoparticles (NPs) can modify polymer rheology, adsorption, interfacial behavior, and flow diversion under selected reservoir conditions. However, reported performance varies substantially with rock mineralogy, permeability, brine salinity, temperature, crude‐oil composition, polymer type, nanoparticle chemistry, particle size, concentration, injection sequence, and slug volume. This review critically evaluates NAPF by separating experimentally verified mechanisms from condition‐dependent or still‐emerging claims. Evidence from rheology, adsorption tests, contact‐angle measurements, interfacial‐tension analysis, micromodel visualization, and core flooding is synthesized to show when NPs improve polymer flooding and when they may cause aggregation, retention, injectivity loss, or formation damage. The review also distinguishes validated reservoir‐simulation approaches from semi‐validated pore‐scale and molecular models and speculative artificial intelligence (AI)/digital‐twin frameworks. Field and pilot‐scale reports are compared using standardized descriptors, including reservoir type, permeability, temperature, salinity, nanomaterial concentration, polymer dosage, slug design, injectivity response, water‐cut trend, and incremental recovery. Finally, a structured research roadmap is proposed for formulation screening, model validation, field monitoring, techno‐economic assessment, and environmental‐risk evaluation. The review emphasizes that NAPF should be interpreted as a reservoir‐specific technology rather than a universally effective EOR method.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar