Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

Closed-loop forecast–optimize–control for renewable-rich microgrids under uncertainty: LSTM forecasting, hybrid GA–PSO dispatch, and adaptive voltage–frequency regulation

Wulfran Fendzi MbassoDepartment of Biosciences, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 602105, IndiaAmbe HarrisonApplied Science Research Center. Applied Science Private University, Amman, JordanZhe LiuShinawatra University, Pathum Thani, 12160, ThailandZokir MamadiyarovDepartment of Economics, Mamun University, Khiva, UzbekistanManish Kumar SinglaElectrical department, Baba Farid College of Engineering andTechnology, Bathinda, Punjab 151001, IndiaRaman KumarDepartment of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, Punjab 141006, India
2026en

Ochiq kirish: yoʻq

ABI

Annotatsiya

A lot of renewable energy sources can cause quick, nonstationary uncertainty that makes it hard for smart microgrids to use decoupled forecast, scheduling, and control pipelines. This study suggests a single closed-loop architecture for predicting, optimizing, and controlling that strongly links short-term renewable forecasting, multi-objective dispatch, and adaptive voltage-frequency regulation for microgrids with a lot of renewable energy. To begin, we utilize Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models to guess how photovoltaic and wind power will change over time. Second, these predictions are given to a hybrid Genetic Algorithm–Particle Swarm Optimization (GA–PSO) scheduler that finds the best balance between dispatch cost, bus-voltage variation, and feeder losses while also meeting DER, battery, and network limits. Third, forecast residuals help gain-scheduled adaptive voltage–frequency regulation, which makes it possible to quickly fix problems when renewable energy sources or loads change. The framework is tested on a high-fidelity MATLAB/Simulink microgrid that has PV, wind, diesel power, and Li-ion battery storage and runs for 24 h with typical disturbances. Compared to traditional droop control with fixed scheduling, the suggested solution cuts the bus-voltage RMSE from 0.0324 p.u.–0.0125 p.u. (about 61%), the daily feeder losses from 52.8 kWh to 42.9 kWh (about 19%), and the time it takes to recover from a disturbance from 7.2 s to 1.8 s (about 75%). The forecasting layer has an RMSE of 0.94 kW, which means it can accurately estimate short-term renewable energy. These results show that tightly linking learning-based forecasting, hybrid metaheuristic scheduling, and residual-aware adaptive control can greatly improve the stability, efficiency, and resilience of a microgrid when there is uncertainty about renewable energy sources. This approach is also suitable for future hardware-in-the-loop and edge-control implementation.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar