Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

Rural Agricultural Efficiency, Climate Sustainability, and Economic Performance: An Examination of Organic and Conventional Farming

Hayder M. Ali<p>Department of Information Technology, College of Science, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa,&nbsp;Karbala&nbsp;56001,&nbsp;Iraq</p>Gayathri Ananthakrishnan<p>Department of Information Technology, School of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore&nbsp;632014,&nbsp;India</p>Anusha Papasani<p>Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Guntur&nbsp;522502,&nbsp;India</p>Suvathipriya Subramani<p>Department of Agricultural Engineering, V.S.B. College of Engineering Technical Campus, Coimbatore&nbsp;642109,&nbsp;India</p>Tariq Qarem<p>Faculty of Architecture and Design, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan</p>Aseel Smerat<p>Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan</p>Zokir MamadiyarovTashkent State University of EconomicsSudhakar Sengan<p>Department of Computer and Science and &nbsp;Engineering, Erode Sengunthar Engineering College, Erode&nbsp;638057, Tamil Nadu, India</p>
2026
Ochiq kirishOltin

Litsenziya: cc-by-nc

ABI

Annotatsiya

Organic farming has emerged as a sustainable alternative to conventional farming, providing potential benefits in environmental conservation, crop quality, and market access. This study measures the impact of organic farming on agricultural productivity, resource utilisation, environmental sustainability, and trade competitiveness in Punjab, India. A comparative analysis of organic and conventional farming was conducted, focusing on key metrics such as crop yield per hectare, soil health, biological diversity, carbon footprint, and market access. As indicated by the research results, while conventional farming generated higher crop yield (e.g., the wheat crop: 4.47 vs. 3.82 t/ha, p = 0.034), organic farming improved in terms of resource utilisation, using less water (130.4 vs. 160.2 m3/t, p = 0.03) and energy consumption (225.6 vs. 270.8 kWh/t, p = 0.02). Organic farming was associated with better soil health (organic farming: 3.8% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.005) and superior biological diversity (species richness: 25 vs. 15, p = 0.008). Both findings were considered statistically significant. In terms of the marketplace, 68.2% of organic farming were able to access top marketplaces, whereas only 40.5% of conventional farming were (p = 0.01). By doing this, these individuals were able to negotiate higher costs (₹75.6 vs. ₹63.4/kg, p = 0.02). There is a clear result that organic farming products can be successful globally, as shown by the revealed comparative advantage (1.53).

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

0 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba