Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

Hybrid Ensemble Machine Learning for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping and Management Planning in the Kamchik Pass, Uzbekistan

Mukhiddin JulievInstitute of Fundamental and Applied Research, “TIIAME” National Research University, Kary-Niyaziy Str. 39, Tashkent 100000, UzbekistanYousef A. Al-MasnayUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaMikhail KomissarovUfa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 450054 Ufa, RussiaAzam KadirhodjaevDepartment of Scientific Research and Innovation, University of Geological Sciences, Tashkent 100164, UzbekistanGany BimurzaevState Establishment Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Tashkent 100041, UzbekistanGanisher AbdullaevState Establishment Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Tashkent 100041, UzbekistanZhuo ChenCollege of Civil Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan 611830, ChinaArslan BerdyyevCAS Research Center for Ecology and Environment of Central Asia, Urumqi 830011, ChinaJilili AbuduwailiCAS Research Center for Ecology and Environment of Central Asia, Urumqi 830011, China
2026en
Ochiq kirishOltin

Litsenziya: cc-by

ABI

Annotatsiya

Landslide susceptibility assessment is essential for maintaining resilient mountain transport corridors where slope failures can disrupt mobility, freight movement, and economic activity. This study evaluated standalone and hybrid machine-learning models for the Kamchik Pass corridor of Uzbekistan, which carries the A-373 Tashkent–Osh highway. Thirteen topographic, hydrological, geological, climatic, vegetation, and land-cover factors were integrated with a landslide inventory. K-nearest neighbours (KNN), Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and artificial neural network (ANN) models were compared to three RF-based hybrids: RF + KNN, RF + XGBoost, and RF + ANN. Performance was assessed using confusion-matrix metrics and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC–AUC), together with variable-importance and class-area analyses. All predictors were retained because variance inflation factors remained below 3.3. Slope and elevation were the most consistent predictors across the standalone models. RF + KNN achieved the best performance, with an accuracy of 0.8429, kappa of 0.6857, sensitivity of 0.8857, specificity of 0.8000, and AUC of 0.88. Its map classified 16.94 km2, approximately 10.8% of the study area, as high or very high susceptibility. Compared to standalone RF, RF + KNN increased accuracy by 2.86 percentage points and AUC by 0.03, while sensitivity decreased from 0.9429 to 0.8857 and specificity increased from 0.6857 to 0.8000. Because these differences were obtained from a small point-level hold-out set without spatially independent validation, they are interpreted as descriptive rather than evidence of universal model superiority. The maps provide a first-pass susceptibility screening layer for subsequent field verification and asset-exposure analysis; they do not constitute an implemented infrastructure-risk assessment.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar