Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

From ministry to market: higher education expansion and state-designed marketization in Uzbekistan, 2015–2025

Azizjon Anvarovich QodirovSamarkand State University named after Sharof RashidovZebiniso Anvarovna RajabovaBukhara State Pedagogical InstituteDmitriy Eduardovich LeeBobir Baxtiyorovich AdizovDepartment of Financing and Economic Development Planning, Bukhara State UniversityKomiljon Fayzulloevich AbdulloevDepartment of Financing and Economic Development Planning, Bukhara State UniversityAlisher Karamatovich IbragimovDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Bukhara State Pedagogical Institute
2026en
ABI

Annotatsiya

How does the state create a market where there once was a ministry? In this Brief Research Report we study the redrawing of the boundary between state and market in the higher education system of Uzbekistan, treating it as a problem of political economy, that is, as an authoritative public choice about allocation and about the design of a market. The legal basis of the process rests on Presidential Decree UP-5,847 of 8 October 2019, which approved the Concept for the Development of Higher Education until 2030, and on Presidential Resolution PQ-61 of 24 December 2021, which from 1 January 2022 granted financial autonomy to a designated list of state universities, including the right to set contract tuition within a ceiling of three times the base rate and to keep year-end balances. We combine a documented analysis of the legal framework with official annual statistics for 2015/16–2024/25 and with an explicitly exploratory, descriptive trend analysis of enrollment. Over this decade total tertiary enrollment grew from 264,300 to 1,432,800 students, or 5.4 times; the number of institutions rose from 69 to 222; and by January 2025 the share of students studying on a fee-paying (contract) basis had reached 88.8%. Segmented trend models describe an acceleration of annual log-growth from about 11% to about 28% under the reference specification. However, the sensitivity analysis shows that break placements in 2017/18 and 2018/19 fit somewhat better than 2019/20, while a 2021/22 placement fits worse, so we attribute the acceleration to the reform period as a whole, and above all to the access-expansion measures that started in 2017–2018, rather than to any single decree. We interpret the findings as a transformation of the developmental state rather than its retreat: the government has moved from direct financier to designer and regulator of a quasi-market whose entry, base price, and price ceiling it still controls.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar