Separating Artificial-Viscosity Annealing from the L-BFGS Viscosity in Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Two-Phase Flow

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) remain difficult to train for hyperbolic conservation laws. Artificial viscosity is a common remedy, and several methods reduce its coefficient during training. We examine adaptive moment estimation (Adam) followed by limited-memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (L-BFGS) optimisation. The schedule followed during Adam, the viscosity used during L-BFGS, and the checkpoint supplied between them can change together. We separate these factors for the one-dimensional Buckley–Leverett equation using a fixed multilayer perceptron with hyperbolic-tangent activations and 15 paired seeds per configuration. The central experiments impose a zero-diffusive-flux outlet condition. Lowering the L-BFGS viscosity from 3.5×10−3 to 1.67×10−4 increased full-grid relative L2 error by 0.0413±0.0069. The schedule–viscosity interaction was −0.0067±0.0075 and was not detected after multiplicity adjustment. A decay ending at 3.5×10−3 improved on the tested low-endpoint decay before high-viscosity polishing, while its difference from constant high viscosity remained inconclusive. The higher of the two tested constant viscosities improved aggregate and pre-breakthrough accuracy but increased post-breakthrough error. Stage-matched curricula showed no detected accuracy advantage; their greater executed cost arose from intermediate diagnostic L-BFGS phases whose states were discarded. These results identify the terminal viscosity, checkpoint rule, outlet treatment, and optimiser exposure as controls needed to interpret schedule comparisons in this pipeline.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan