Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

Measure-Based Supervision for Tiny Object Detection in Aerial Imagery

Rashid NasimovDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University Sujeong-Gu, Seongnam-si 13120, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of KoreaJasur SevinovDepartment of Computer Engineering, University of Tashkent for Applied Sciences, Tashkent 100149, UzbekistanAkmalbek AbdusalomovDepartment of International Scientific Journals and Rankings, Alfraganus University, Yukori Karakamish Street 2a, Tashkent 100190, UzbekistanYucel OgurluDepartment of Computer Engineering, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir 10145, TürkiyeNarziev NosirDepartment of Computer Systems, Tashkent University of Information Technologies Named After Muhammad Al-Khwarizmi, Tashkent 100200, UzbekistanAbbosjon AbdullaevDepartment of Electronics and Instrumentation, Fergana State Technical University, Fergana 150100, UzbekistanAlpamis KutlimuratovDepartment of Applied Informatics, Kimyo International University in Tashkent, Tashkent 100121, UzbekistanKuldoshbay AvazovDepartment of Software Engineering, Samarkand State University, Samarkand 140100, UzbekistanYoung Im ChoDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University Sujeong-Gu, Seongnam-si 13120, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea
2026en
Ochiq kirishOltin

Litsenziya: cc-by

ABI

Annotatsiya

Detection breaks down on objects a few pixels wide for a structural reason: as box side length shrinks, intersection over union (IoU) degenerates toward an indicator of exact pixel coincidence, so a one-pixel error can rewrite both the label assignment and the regression gradient. We avoid this regime by discarding pairwise box matching altogether. A scene is treated instead as an unnormalized positive measure over object centers, log-scales, and categories, and training minimizes a debiased, uncertainty-aware unbalanced optimal transport divergence between the predicted measure and a Gaussian-smoothed annotation measure. Soft correspondences replace hard assignment, and because the marginals are left free, total confidence mass survives as count supervision. A second training-only signal is drawn from the image itself predicted instances are rendered back to pixels through anisotropic Gaussian footprints, a shared blur kernel, pixel integration, and a capacity limited background, then compared with the observation under a Poisson–Gaussian noise model. Scene priors enter through a clipped log-space gate that caps how far context may suppress appearance evidence, a bound we audit by reporting recall on atypical placements alongside aggregate gains. The method reaches 31.7 AP on the AI-TOD-v2 validation split, including 23.4 AP on 2–8-pixel objects, and 36.8, 37.1, and 31.2 AP on SODA-D, SODA-A, and AI-TOD-R, with 53.6 AP on tiny persons in TinyPerson. Ablations isolate the contribution of each component.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

0 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba