TRANSLATION ISSUES OF COMPLEX ANALYTICAL FORMS CARRYING GRAMMATICAL MEANING

This article examines the challenges of translating complex analytical grammatical forms across languages, with a particular focus on English structures. Analytical forms, which consist of auxiliary verbs, particles, and syntactic constructions, encode grammatical meanings such as tense, aspect, mood, and voice. The study highlights that differences between source and target language systems often lead to grammatical mismatch, semantic loss, and pragmatic shifts. Drawing on contemporary translation theories and scholars such as Baker, House, Halliday, and Munday, the article analyzes how functional, semantic, and stylistic equivalence can be achieved in translation. It also discusses common translation strategies, including restructuring, simplification, omission, and compensation. The findings indicate that translators must balance form and meaning while considering contextual and discourse factors. The study concludes that functional equivalence and contextual adaptation are essential for accurately conveying the meaning of analytical constructions, especially in academic and technical texts.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan