Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

Interpretable Machine Learning for Identifying the Key Factors Controlling Nanocarrier Entrapment Efficiency

Husni S. FarahFaculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, JordanMunira KhusainovaDepartment of Propedeutics of Internal Disease. Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, UzbekistanNigina XalikovaDepartment of Medical Fundamental Sciences, Termez University of Economics and Service, Termez, UzbekistanGowrishankar JDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, IndiaMohammed Wael MohammedComputer technical engineering, college of technical engineering, The islamic university, Najaf, IraqIrwanjot KaurCentre for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, IndiaVikas WassonDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, IndiaMerwa AbolhekmatEngineering Faculty, Paktia University, Paktia, Afghanistan
2026en
Ochiq kirishGibrid

Litsenziya: cc-by

ABI

Annotatsiya

Accurately predicting entrapment efficiency (EE) in nanocarrier formulations remains a central challenge in formulation science due to the nonlinear interplay between molecular descriptors, compositional ratios, and process parameters. In this study, a curated dataset of 127 nanocarrier formulations was modeled using seven machine learning regressors including Decision Tree, AdaBoost, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Linear Regression, and an ensemble learning strategy to identify the most reliable predictive approach for EE estimation. Model performance was evaluated using R², mean squared error (MSE), and average absolute relative error (AARE%) across training, test, and total datasets. The results demonstrate that AdaBoost, Decision Tree, and Ensemble Learning achieved the strongest predictive performance, with test-set R² values of 0.924, 0.900, and 0.914, respectively, and correspondingly low MSE values. These models consistently outperformed Random Forest and KNN, which showed moderate predictive capability (test R² = 0.811 and 0.765). SVR and Linear Regression exhibited limited suitability for this nonlinear formulation space, reflected by substantially lower R² values (0.508 and 0.054) and higher AARE%. The superior performance of tree-based and boosting models highlights their ability to capture complex, multivariate interactions governing EE. The findings confirm that boosting-based and ensemble approaches provide the most robust and accurate predictive framework for EE estimation in heterogeneous nanocarrier systems. These results support the integration of data-driven modeling into formulation design workflows, enabling more efficient screening, reduced experimental burden, and improved mechanistic understanding of the physicochemical determinants of entrapment efficiency.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar