Decriminalizing Ethical Hacking through Penal Policy Exemptions to Counter Transnational Cyber Crime

This study examines the critical failure of domestic cybersecurity legislation, highlighting how outdated penal provisions actively criminalize ethical security researchers and inadvertently assist transnational cybercriminal syndicates. The national digital defense model confronts a profound jurisprudential dilemma where broad statutory formulations of unauthorized access under Articles 30 through 36 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law expose white-hat hackers to severe criminal liability. This normative legal research evaluates the dangerous regulatory ambiguity surrounding ethical hacking in Indonesia against advanced penal exemption frameworks used in global jurisdictions. Findings reveal that the Indonesian criminal justice system enforces strict liability for digital intrusions, completely failing to distinguish malicious cyberattacks from good-faith forensic vulnerability testing. This absence of mens rea evaluation creates a systemic chilling effect, paralyzing proactive digital defenses and actively deterring critical threat reporting. Achieving proportional penal protection requires comprehensive legislative reform that embeds a mandatory penal exemption doctrine for authorized digital forensics. The state must explicitly decriminalize ethical hacking, establish standardized vulnerability disclosure protocols, and implement a pretrial forensic audit mechanism to guarantee absolute legal immunity for researchers securing the national digital ecosystem. Keywords: Cybercrime, Decriminalization, Mens Rea, Penal Policy, White Hat Hackers.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan