Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

A Reproducible Screening Procedure for Hardfaced Sealing Surfaces of Wedge Gate Valves: An Sv-10Kh17T (ER430Ti) Case Study

Zhanara MussinaFaculty of Engineering, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar 140008, KazakhstanDinara IskakovaFaculty of Engineering, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar 140008, KazakhstanAsylbek Zh. KasenovOffice of the Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs, Margulan University, Pavlodar 140000, KazakhstanAizhan TaskarinaFaculty of Engineering, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar 140008, KazakhstanТ. Л. ЛубFaculty of Engineering, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar 140008, KazakhstanLeila MussinaFaculty of Engineering, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar 140008, KazakhstanIbragimova Zaure Assilbekovna,Faculty of Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering and Oil and Gas Engineering, Mukhtar Auezov South Kazakhstan Research University, Shymkent 160012, KazakhstanAlmagul BaltabekovaDavran RadjibaevFaculty of Railway Transport Engineering, Tashkent State Transport University, Tashkent 100176, Uzbekistan
2026en
Ochiq kirishOltin

Litsenziya: cc-by

ABI

Annotatsiya

Gate-valve repair decisions may rely on numerical and tribological datasets generated at different scales. Combining them can produce unsupported claims when wear results are reported only as ranges. This study introduces a reproducible screening procedure and demonstrates it with previously published results for Grade 20 steel with and without Sv-10Kh17T (ER430Ti) hardfacing. For each lower-is-better wear metric, an interval improvement factor was calculated from untreated and hardfaced ranges; strict dominance required the conservative lower bound to exceed unity. The tribological screen was combined with component-level stress and displacement ratios and an evidence-sufficiency grade. For dry contact, the improvement-factor intervals were 1.67–4.00 for mass loss and 1.60–4.00 for wear depth. In distilled water, the corresponding intervals were 1.50–5.00 and 1.25–4.00. For HOCUT 795 H-eu, both lower bounds equaled 1.00; thus, the range-only data did not establish strict dominance. The component-scale stress ratio after hardfacing was 0.895 for the water load case, 1.039 for steam, and 1.114 for petroleum products. The procedure classifies the hardfacing as eligible for validation under dry and aqueous laboratory conditions, but not as qualified for deployment because allowable-stress verification, mesh convergence, interface validation, and replicate-level wear statistics are unavailable. The rule separates reduced material removal from structural admissibility and service-life claims.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar