Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

A Central Asian Delphi consensus on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of surgical complications in metabolic and bariatric surgery

Орал ОспановNCJSC “Astana Medical University”, Astana, KazakhstanBolatbek BaymakhanovNational Scientific Center of Surgery Named After A.N. Syzganov, KazakhstanHaris A KhwajaChelsea and Westminster Hospital & Imperial College, London, United KingdomZhanbolat DildabekovYelembayev BakhtiyarAdil ShokebayevNational Scientific Center of Surgery Named After A.N. Syzganov, KazakhstanYu I YashkovOktyabr TeshaevTashkent Medical Academy, UzbekistanUmid RuzievTashkent Medical Academy, UzbekistanNozim JumaevTashkent Medical Academy, UzbekistanAlisher MukhamedkarimovTashkent Medical Academy, UzbekistanElnar NigmatullinTukhtayev DilshodTashkent Medical Academy, UzbekistanBaigazakov AsylbekJamakhon RakhmonovAmonov ShukhratBekhruz HakimzodaOnon BaljinnyamNational Cancer Center of Mongolia, MongoliaTalgat MukantayevNurkasi AbatovNCJSC “Karaganda Medical University”, KazakhstanRuslan KhassenovAmanzhol DyussupovMusa SahipovOlzhas ShulenbayevNurken ZheldibaevAskar BoranbayevSergazin ZhenisAlimzhan NurashevKassymkhan SultanovYerdaulet NaraliyevAset YelemesovGalymjan Duysenov
2026en
Ochiq kirishGibrid

Litsenziya: cc-by-nc

ABI

Annotatsiya

Background: The volume of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is rapidly increasing in Central Asia and is accompanied by a growing burden of postoperative complications. Despite the availability of international guidelines, regional differences in healthcare infrastructure and resources necessitate context-specific, evidence-based recommendations. This study establishes the first standardized, regionally agreed-upon consensus for managing MBS complications, specifically tailored to the infrastructure and resources of Central Asia. Methods: A modified Delphi consensus was reached under the auspices of the Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgeons of Kazakhstan. A steering committee developed 29 statements addressing early and late surgical complications after MBS. Forty expert bariatric surgeons from four Central Asian countries were invited to participate. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement on a three-point Likert scale across two rounds: an online survey followed by an in-person consensus meeting under international observation. Results: Twenty-seven experts (67.5%) completed round 1. Consensus was achieved for 24 of 29 statements (82.8%), covering prevention, diagnosis, and management of bleeding, staple-line leaks, strictures, metabolic disturbances, marginal ulcers, and internal hernias. Five statements did not reach consensus, reflecting heterogeneity in resources and unresolved evidence gaps. Analysis of non-consensus statements reveals critical resource limitations and evidence gaps, providing a clear roadmap for targeted training and future multicenter research. Conclusions: This study presents the first regionally agreed-upon consensus for managing MBS complications in Central Asia. The endorsed statements provide a practical framework aligned with international standards while accommodating regional realities. Areas without consensus highlight priorities for future education and collaborative research, offering a model for other middle-income countries facing similar barriers.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar