Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

Risk Regimes and Price Stability: Threshold Effects of Geopolitical Risk, Economic Policy Uncertainty, and Energy-Related Uncertainty on Inflation in G7 Economies

Tolmasjon SuvonovFront Office Department, Registrar’s Office, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, UzbekistanСухроб ХолматовDepartment of Finance and Banking, Karshi State Technical University, Karshi 180100, UzbekistanZokir MamadiyarovDepartment of Finance, Alfraganus University, Tashkent 100190, UzbekistanIlyos AbdurakhmonovDepartment of Economics and Finance, Tashkent International University, Tashkent 100084, UzbekistanNuriddin ShanyazovDepartment of Economics, Mamun University, Khiva 220900, UzbekistanIlhomjon FarmonovKokand State UniversityNargiza RaxmatullayevaDepartment of Economics, Kimyo International University in Tashkent, Tashkent 100121, Uzbekistan
2026en
Ochiq kirishOltin

Litsenziya: cc-by

ABI

Annotatsiya

Heightened geopolitical tensions, policy shocks, and energy-market turbulence have renewed concerns about price stability in advanced economies. This paper examines whether geopolitical risk (GPR), economic policy uncertainty (EPU), and energy-related uncertainty (EUI) are associated with inflation linearly or through distinct risk regimes. Monthly data for Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States from 2013M2 to 2023M10 are analysed using second-generation panel methods accounting for cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity. CS-ARDL, CCEMG, AMG, and CCEP estimates indicate positive inflation associations for GPR and, most robustly, EUI, while EPU exhibits only weak linear significance. Block-bootstrap tests identify significant thresholds for GPR and EUI, with weaker evidence for EPU. Dynamic CCE threshold estimates show that the long-run inflation association with EUI is several times stronger above its threshold, primarily during the 2022 energy crisis. This amplification survives alternative controls and specifications but loses significance when 2022 is excluded, indicating crisis-driven regime identification. Lagged estimates suggest delayed inflation responses to EPU, while quantile regression reveals stronger associations at higher inflation levels. Panel causality tests identify predictive content for GPR but not EPU or EUI, while inflation predicts all three uncertainty indices. The findings are interpreted as conditional, regime-dependent associations rather than structural causal effects, supporting risk-sensitive monetary and energy policies that treat estimated thresholds as sample-specific benchmarks rather than mechanical policy triggers.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar