Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

4D-QSAR Analysis of a Set of Ecdysteroids and a Comparison to CoMFA Modeling

Malini RaviUniversity of Illinois ChicagoA. J. HopfingerLaboratory of Molecular Modeling and Design (M/C-781), University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Pharmacy, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612-7231, RHeoGene, L.L.C., P.O. Box 949, Spring House, Pennsylvania 19477-0904, and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4PS, U.KRobert E. HormannUniversity of Illinois ChicagoLaurence DinanUniversity of Illinois Chicago
2001en
ABI

Annotatsiya

The ecdysteroid-responsive Drosophila melanogaster B(II) cell line is a prototypical homologous inducible gene expression system. A training set of 71 ecdysteroids, for which the -log(EC(50)) potencies in the ecdysteroid-responsive B(II) cell line were measured, was used to construct 4D-QSAR models. Four nearly equivalent optimum 4D-QSAR models, for two modestly different alignments, were identified (Q(2) = 0.76-0.80). These four models, together with two CoMFA models, were used in consensus modeling to arrive at a three-dimensional pharmacophore. The C-2 and C-22 hydroxyls are identified as hydrogen-bond acceptor sites which enhance activity. A hydrophobic site near C-12 is consistent with increasing activity. The side-chain substituents at C-17 are predicted to adopt semiextended "active" conformations which could fit into a cylinder-shaped binding pocket lined largely with nonpolar residues for enhanced activity. A test set of 20 ecdysteroids was used to evaluate the QSAR models. Two 4D-QSAR models for one alignment were identified to be superior to the others based on having the smallest average residuals of prediction for the prediction set (0.69 and 1.13 -log[EC(50)] units). The correlation coefficients of the optimum 4D-QSAR models (R(2) = 0.87 and 0.88) are nearly the same as those of the best CoMFA model (R(2) = 0.92) determined for the same training set. However, the cross-validation correlation coefficient of the CoMFA model is less significant (Q(2) = 0.59) than those of the 4D-QSAR models (Q(2) = 0.80 and 0.80).

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

4 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba