Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Boshqa

Digital Innovation Pathways in Engineering and STEM Education: Curriculum Transformation, Skills Alignment, and Learning System Responsiveness

Боҳодир ИсроиловDoctor of Economics, Professor of the Department of Financial Analysis, Tashkent State University of Economics, [email protected], 0000-0002-0669-5355Ozodakhon ShukurillaevaNational Pedagogical University of Uzbekistan, School of Exact Sciences, [email protected], 0009-0008-9535-0287Azamat MetyakubovHigher School of Science, Tashkent Architecture and Construction University, [email protected], 0000-0003-0133-3707Zarrukh MukhammadievDSc (Accounting, Economic Analysis and Audit), Associate Professor, Samarkand Institute of Economics and Service, [email protected], 0009-0003-3870-2497Бобур БороновDSc (Accounting, Economic Analysis and Audit), Associate Professor, Samarkand Institute of Economics and Service, [email protected], 0000-0002-2597-4755Ochilov OlmosDSc, Associate Professor of the Department of Financial analysis, Tashkent State University of Economics, [email protected], 0000-0002-6882-0748
2026
ABI

Annotatsiya

Digital innovation pathways in engineering and STEM education (ESE) can play an important role in enhancing both curriculum relevance and graduate skills alignment. With this in mind, the present research aims to jointly assess and compare the efficiency of digital integration of engineering curricula in relation to their learning outcomes (LOs) responsiveness. It employs a propensity score matching strategy for this analysis and finds that, on average and particularly in the post-reform period, declines in curriculum rigidity were associated with increased digital skill acquisition in engineering education across all program types, while instructional flexibility was associated with increased (reduced) learning outcomes in programs with strong (weak) digital integration. The research employs a SEM-based analysis of curriculum design and skills alignment, and uses a matching-based approach to reveal causal learning effects. Results revealed that overall learning performance grew at a modest rate of improvement, mainly powered by curriculum redesign at program level and a gradual decline in skills mismatch at cohort level with substantial variation amongst institutions. As policy makers in higher education increasingly prioritize increases in graduate employability as a strategic objective, these findings are of practical relevance. Investments in digital infrastructure, faculty development, and curriculum governance are suggested to improve skills inequality and declining learning responsiveness.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar