Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
proceeding

Organizational Clustering Using Fuzzy C-Means for Business Unit Performance Benchmarking

Muhidinov Ayubbek NuritdinovichTuran International UniversityTursunova ShaxnozaUniversity of Tashkent for Applied SciencesG.Chitra GanabathiVijay SSt.Joseph's Institute of Technology, OMRShinki Katyayani PandeyKalinga University
2026en
Ochiq kirishOltin

Litsenziya: cc-by

ABI

Annotatsiya

Business unit performance benchmarking is considered an important management control technique used in multinational corporations. The general methodology used here is the application of the clustering algorithm (K-Means and hierarchical agglomerative clustering). The application of this method leads to a rigid assignment of units to different performance classes and may eventually overlook an important category of business units that could fall into several tiers at once. The Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering model proposes a solution to this problem. The method suggests that instead of binary assignment, each business unit gets a degree of membership μ_{ik}$\in[0, 1]$for each cluster k. The current paper demonstrates the implementation of the FCM model to the analysis of the performance of 2,840 business units from 18 multinational corporations (manufacturing - 8, finance - 6, technology - 4) over the period of 3 fiscal years (FY2022-FY2024). The research uses 28 KPIs. FCM with five clusters$(\mathbf{c}=\mathbf{5})$, fuzziness parameter$\mathbf{m}=\mathbf{2. 0}$, convergence threshold$\varepsilon=0.0001$, and a maximum of 300 iterations achieves an Xie-Beni (XB) validity index of 0.284-a 41.3% improvement over K-Means (XB: 0.484)-and a partition coefficient$\mathbf{P C}=\mathbf{0. 8 4 2}$. The five identified clusters range from High Performance (C1: 18.4% of units; mean performance index 84.2) to Underperforming (C5: 7.6%; index 28.4), with the portfolio weighted mean of$61.7 (\mathbf{0. 1 8 4} \times \mathbf{8 4. 2}+\mathbf{0. 2 4 8} \times \mathbf{7 2. 4}+\mathbf{0. 3 2 4} \times \mathbf{5 8. 4}+\mathbf{0. 1 6 8} \times \mathbf{4 2. 8}+\mathbf{0. 0 7 6} \times \mathbf{2 8}$.$4=61.7)$. A total of 612 business units (21.6% of the portfolio) exhibit maximum cluster membership below 0.70, identifying them as genuine performance boundary cases warranting individualised benchmarking analysis rather than tier-level intervention.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar