Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
AkademIndex

Mahsulotlar

Ishlab chiquvchilar uchun

AkademBaseEkotizim uchun ochiq API
Maqola

Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Indian Soft Power Strategy

Syed Hasanat ShahSyed Hasanat Shah has a PhD in World Economy and is currently an Associate Professor in the School of Economics at Jilin University, China. He has published articles on institutions, global political economy, and international economics in various peer reviewed journalsHafsa HasnatHafsa Hasnat has a PhD in World Economy and is an Assistant Professor at the Kohat University of Science and Technology (KUST), Pakistan. She focuses on economic and political economic developments in South AsiaSteven RosefieldeSteven Rosefielde is Professor of Comparative Economic Systems at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. He has authored several books and extensively published in peer reviewed journals
Asian Politics & Policyjournal2017en
ABI

Annotatsiya

In the last two decades, China and India emerged as potential contenders for great power status. During this period, both invested in soft power and capitalized on perceptions of their growing power to advance their interests without locking horns with entrenched stakeholders. This study compares the elements of Chinese and Indian soft power strategies and their impact on the international arena. The findings suggest that China's soft power strategy is more coherent than India's. China is doing well in cultural activities, people to people contacts, attracting foreign students from diverse backgrounds, and portraying itself as a progressive resilient economy while India has an upper hand projecting an image of country with a vibrant civil society and democratic order. Despite differences in spending and development, China's and India's strategies have been equally effective in favorably influencing foreign public perceptions.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Mavzular

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar