Psychometric Properties and Correlates of Precarious Manhood Beliefs in 62 Nations
Jennifer K. BossonUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, USAPaweł JurekUniversity of Gdansk, PolandJoseph A. VandelloUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, USANatasza Kosakowska‐BerezeckaUniversity of Gdansk, PolandMichał OlechUniversity of Gdansk, PolandTomasz BestaUniversity of Gdansk, PolandMichael BenderGratia Christian College, Hong KongVera HoorensUniversity of Leuven (KU Leuven), BelgiumMaja BeckerUniversité de Toulouse, FranceA. Timur SevincerUniversity of Hamburg, GermanyDeborah L. BestWake Forest University, USASaba SafdarUniversity of Guelph, CanadaAnna WłodarczykUniversidad Católica del Norte, ChileMagdalena ZawiszaAnglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UKMagdalena ŻadkowskaUniversity of Gdansk, PolandSami AbuhamdehIstanbul Sehir University, TurkeyCollins Badu AgyemangUniversity of Ghana, GhanaGülçin AkbaşAtilim University, TurkeyNihan Albayrak‐AydemirLondon School of Economics and Political Science, UKSoline AmmiratiUniversité Grenoble Alpes, FranceJoel AndersonAustralian Catholic University, AustraliaGulnaz AnjumInstitute of Business Administration Karachi, PakistanAmarina AriyantoUniversity of Indonesia, IndonesiaJohn Jamir Benzon R. ArutaDe La Salle University, PhilippinesMujeeba AshrafUniversity of the Punjab, PakistanAistė BakaitytėMykolas Romeris University, LithuaniaChiara BertolliUniversity of Padova, ItalyDashamir BërxulliUniversity of Prishtina, KosovoChongzeng BiSouthwest University, ChinaKatharina BlockNew York University, USAMandy BoehnkeUniversity of Bremen, GermanyRenata BongiornoUniversity of Exeter, UKJanine BosakDublin City University, IrelandAnnalisa CasiniUniversité Catholique de Louvain, BelgiumQingwei ChenSouth China Normal University, ChinaPeilian ChiUniversity of Macau, ChinaVera Ćubela AdorićUniversity of Zadar, CroatiaSerena DaalmansRadboud University Nijmegen, NetherlandsJustine DandyEdith Cowan University, AustraliaSoledad de LemusUniversity of Granada, SpainSandesh DhakalTribhuvan University, NepalН В ДворянчиковMoscow State University of Psychology and Education, RussiaSonoko EgamiShiraume Gakuen University, JapanEdgardo EtchezaharUniversity of Buenos Aires, ArgentinaCarla Sofia EstevesInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, Lisboa, PortugalNeto FelixFaculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade do Porto, PortugalLaura FroehlichFernUniversität in Hagen, GermanyEfraín García‐SánchezAlin GavreliucWest University of Timisoara, RomaniaDana GavreliucWest University of Timisoara, RomaniaÁngel GómezUniversidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, SpainFrancesca GuizzoUniversity of Padova, ItalySylvie GrafCzech Academy of Sciences, Czech RepublicHedy GreijdanusUniversity of Groningen, NetherlandsAni GrigoryanYerevan State University, ArmeniaJoanna Grzymała-MoszczyńskaJagiellonian University, PolandKeltouma GuerchMarie Gustafsson SendénStockholm University, SwedenMiriam‐Linnea HaleUniversity of Luxembourg, LuxembourgHannah HämerUniversity of Brasilia, BrazilMika HiraiYokohama City University, JapanLam Hoang DucVietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamMartina Hřebı́čkováCzech Academy of Sciences, Czech RepublicPaul B. HutchingsUniversity of Wales Trinity Saint David, UKDorthe Høj JensenAarhus University, DenmarkInga Jasinskaja‐LahtiUniversity of Helsinki, FinlandSerdar KarabatıIstanbul Bilgi University, TurkeyKaltrina KelmendiUniversity of Prishtina, KosovoJudith Gabriella KengyelPazmany Peter Catholic University, HungaryNarine KhachatryanYerevan State University, ArmeniaRawan GhazzawiHaigazian University, LebanonMary KinahanTechnological University Dublin, IrelandTeri A. KirbyUniversity of Exeter, UKMónika KovácsEötvös Loránd University, HungaryDesirée KozlowskiSouthern Cross University, AustraliaВладислав КривощековUniversity of Bern, SwitzerlandClara KulichUniversity of Geneva, SwitzerlandTai KurosawaIbaraki Christian University, JapanNhan Thi Lac AnVietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamJavier LabartheUniversidad Católica del Uruguay, UruguayIoana M. LatuQueen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UKMary Anne LauriUniversity of Malta, MaltaEric S. MankowskiPortland State University, USAAbiodun Musbau LawalFederal University Oye-Ekiti, NigeriaJunyi LiSichuan Normal University, ChinaJana LindnerUniversity of Basel, SwitzerlandAnna LindqvistLund University, SwedenAngela T. MaitnerAmerican University of Sharjah, United Arab EmiratesElena MakarovaUniversity of Basel, SwitzerlandAna MakashviliIlia State University, GeorgiaShera MalayeriUniversity of Bern, SwitzerlandSadia MalikUniversity of Sargodha, PakistanTiziana ManciniUniversity of Parma, ItalyClaudia ManziCatholic University of Milan, ItalySilvia MariUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, ItalySarah E. MartinyUiT The Arctic University of Norway, NorwayClaude‐Hélène MayerUniversity of Johannesburg, South AfricaVladimir MihićUniversity of Novi Sad, SerbiaJasna Milošević ĐorđevićSingindunum University, SerbiaEva Moreno‐BellaUniversity of Granada, Spain
ABI
Annotatsiya
Precarious manhood beliefs portray manhood, relative to womanhood, as a social status that is hard to earn, easy to lose, and proven via public action. Here, we present cross-cultural data on a brief measure of precarious manhood beliefs (the Precarious Manhood Beliefs scale [PMB]) that covaries meaningfully with other cross-culturally validated gender ideologies and with country-level indices of gender equality and human development. Using data from university samples in 62 countries across 13 world regions ( N = 33,417), we demonstrate: (1) the psychometric isomorphism of the PMB (i.e., its comparability in meaning and statistical properties across the individual and country levels); (2) the PMB’s distinctness from, and associations with, ambivalent sexism and ambivalence toward men; and (3) associations of the PMB with nation-level gender equality and human development. Findings are discussed in terms of their statistical and theoretical implications for understanding widely-held beliefs about the precariousness of the male gender role.
Hali tarjima qilinmagan
Mavzular
Identifikatorlar
Iqtiboslar va manbalar
0 ta iqtibos62 ta foydalanilgan manba