Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
AkademIndex

Mahsulotlar

Ishlab chiquvchilar uchun

AkademBaseEkotizim uchun ochiq API
Maqola

Deep learning-based postoperative glioblastoma segmentation and extent of resection evaluation: Development, external validation, and model comparison

Santiago CepedaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital , Valladolid ,Roberto Romero-OraáBiomedical Engineering Group, Universidad de Valladolid , Valladolid ,Lidia LuqueComputational Radiology and Artificial Intelligence (CRAI), Department of Physics and Computational Radiology, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital , Oslo ,Daniel García‐PérezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Albacete University Hospital , Albacete ,Guillermo BlascoDepartment of Neurosurgery, La Princesa University Hospital , Madrid ,Luigi Tommaso LuppinoDepartment of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø ,Samuel KuttnerDepartment of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø ,Olga Esteban-SinovasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital , Valladolid ,Ignacio ArreseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital , Valladolid ,Ole SolheimDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim ,Live EikenesDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) , Trondheim ,Anna KarlbergDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) , Trondheim ,Ángel Pérez‐NúñezDepartment of Neurosurgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i + 12) , Madrid ,Olivier ZanierMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich , Zürich ,Carlo SerraMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich , Zürich ,Victor E. StaartjesMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich , Zürich ,Andrea BianconiDivision of Neurosurgery, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences , Genoa ,Luca Francesco RossiDepartment of Informatics, Polytechnic University of Turin , Turin ,Diego GarbossaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini,” University of Turin , Turin ,Trinidad EscuderoDepartment of Radiology, Río Hortega University Hospital , Valladolid ,Roberto HorneroBiomedical Engineering Group, Universidad de Valladolid , Valladolid ,Rosario SarabiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital , Valladolid ,
Neuro-Oncology Advancesjournal2024en
ABI

Annotatsiya

Background: The pursuit of automated methods to assess the extent of resection (EOR) in glioblastomas is challenging, requiring precise measurement of residual tumor volume. Many algorithms focus on preoperative scans, making them unsuitable for postoperative studies. Our objective was to develop a deep learning-based model for postoperative segmentation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also compared our model's performance with other available algorithms. Methods: To develop the segmentation model, a training cohort from 3 research institutions and 3 public databases was used. Multiparametric MRI scans with ground truth labels for contrast-enhancing tumor (ET), edema, and surgical cavity, served as training data. The models were trained using MONAI and nnU-Net frameworks. Comparisons were made with currently available segmentation models using an external cohort from a research institution and a public database. Additionally, the model's ability to classify EOR was evaluated using the RANO-Resect classification system. To further validate our best-trained model, an additional independent cohort was used. Results: The study included 586 scans: 395 for model training, 52 for model comparison, and 139 scans for independent validation. The nnU-Net framework produced the best model with median Dice scores of 0.81 for contrast ET, 0.77 for edema, and 0.81 for surgical cavities. Our best-trained model classified patients into maximal and submaximal resection categories with 96% accuracy in the model comparison dataset and 84% in the independent validation cohort. Conclusions: Our nnU-Net-based model outperformed other algorithms in both segmentation and EOR classification tasks, providing a freely accessible tool with promising clinical applicability.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Mavzular

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar