Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
AkademIndex

Mahsulotlar

Ishlab chiquvchilar uchun

AkademBaseEkotizim uchun ochiq API
Maqola

Complications of anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in real-life practice: What we learnt from the 6,193 patients from the Refinement in Endoscopic Anatomical enucleation of Prostate registry

Jean K. LimDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, SingaporeThomas R W HerrmannDepartment of Urology, Kantonspital Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, SwitzerlandDaniele CastellaniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, ItalyKhi Yung FongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, SingaporeEdwin Jonathan AslimDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, SingaporeSarvajit BiligereDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, SingaporeAzimdjon TursunkulovUrology Division, Akfa Medline Hospital, Tashkent, UzbekistanMarco DellabellaUrology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, ItalyFernando Gómez SanchaDepartment of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, SpainMario SoferDepartment of Urology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, IsraelDmitry EnikeevDepartment of Urology, Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, RussiaMarcelo Langer WroclawskiHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, BrasilVladislav PetovDepartment of Urology, Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, RussiaNariman GadzhievDepartment of Urology, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint Petersburg, RussiaDean EltermanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, CanadaAbhay MahajanDepartment of Urology, Sai Urology Hospital and MGM Medical College, Aurangabad, IndiaM.E. Rodríguez SocarrásDepartment of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, SpainD.S. YunusovUrology Division, Akfa Medline Hospital, Tashkent, UzbekistanF. NasirovUrology Department, Tashkent Medical Academy, UzbekistanJeremy Yuen‐Chun TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, ChinaBhaskar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United KingdomVineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
ABI

Annotatsiya

Introduction: Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) is a guideline-recommended treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We aimed to analyze postoperative complications and outcomes within a large real-world database. Material and methods: The Refinement in Endoscopic Anatomical enucleation of Prostate (REAP) registry includes patients who received AEEP for BPH in 8 centers worldwide from January 2020 to January 2022. Exclusion criteria included previous prostate/urethral surgery, prostate cancer, pelvic radiotherapy, and concomitant lower urinary tract surgery (internal urethrotomy, cystolithotripsy, or transurethral resection of bladder tumor). The primary outcome was postoperative incontinence; secondary outcomes included early complications (<30 days) and late complications (>30 days). Results: We analyzed 6,193 patients; the mean age was 68 years. Thulium laser was used in 37% and high-power holmium laser in 32%. Median operation time was 67 min [IQR 50-95 min]. The 2-lobe enucleation technique was utilized in 49%, and en-bloc resection was utilized in 39%. Early postoperative complications included urinary tract infection (4.7%), acute urinary retention (4.1%), post-operative bleeding requiring additional intervention (0.9%), and sepsis requiring intensive care admission (0.1%). The incidence of postoperative incontinence was 14.8%, of which 54% were stress incontinence; 84% cases resolved by 3 months. On univariate and multivariate analysis, prostate volume >100 ml was a significant predictor of postoperative incontinence. Late complications such as bulbar urethral stricture, bladder neck sclerosis, and need for redo BPH surgery each occurred in <1% of patients. Conclusions: Analysis of the real-world REAP database shows favorable safety outcomes for AEEP, with a low incidence of serious complications and postoperative incontinence beyond 3 months.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Mavzular

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar