Hydrogen mixing performance of single and equivalent multi-chevron transverse jets in supersonic crossflow
Annotatsiya
Efficient fuel–air mixing within the extremely short residence time of a scramjet combustor remains one of the major challenges for sustained hypersonic propulsion. In the present study, the effects of chevron transverse injectors and internal flow-control modification on hydrogen mixing in a Mach 4 supersonic crossflow are numerically investigated. Four injection configurations are examined: a single chevron jet, a single chevron jet with an internal extruded rod, equivalent multi-chevron jets, and equivalent multi-chevron jets with internal extruded rods. Three-dimensional unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations coupled with the SST turbulence model are performed using a density-based implicit solver under non-reacting compressible flow conditions. The governing equations include conservation of mass, momentum, energy, and hydrogen species transport. The results show that the internal rod significantly modifies the near-field jet structure by splitting the fuel core, increasing shear-layer instability, and promoting additional streamwise vortices. The equivalent multi-jet arrangements generate stronger jet–jet interactions and broader distributed mixing zones than the single-jet cases. Fuel mixing efficiency increases continuously downstream for all configurations; however, the multi-chevron injector with internal rod provides the best overall performance, reaching a mixing efficiency of approximately 0.37 at 40 mm downstream, compared with 0.34, 0.34, and 0.29 for the multi-jet without rod, single-jet with rod, and baseline single-jet cases, respectively. Overall, the combination of chevron shaping, distributed multi-jet injection, and internal rod modification enhances hydrogen mixing under the investigated Mach 4 non-reacting conditions. Among the four configurations considered, the multi-chevron injector with internal rod provides the highest downstream mixing efficiency, although this improvement is accompanied by a modest increase in total pressure loss relative to the corresponding multi-jet configuration without the rod. Therefore, Multi-Jets #2 represents a favorable configuration within the specific operating and geometric conditions examined here, rather than a universally optimal injector design. Further studies over a wider range of operating conditions and combustor configurations are required to establish broader design guidelines.
Hali tarjima qilinmagan