Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

Euclid preparation

R PaviotAstrophysique, Instrumentation et ModélisationB. JoachimiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College LondonKai HoffmannInstitute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UABSandrine CodisCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesI. TutusausUniversité de ToulouseD. Navarro-GironésLeiden Observatory, Leiden UniversityJ. BlazekDepartment of Physics, Northeastern UniversityFabian Hervas PetersUniversité Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM, 91191B. AltieriESAC/ESAS. AndreonINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraN. AuricchioINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaC. BaccigalupiINFN, Sezione di TriesteMarco BaldiINFN-Sezione di BolognaS. BardelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaA. BivianoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteE. BranchiniDipartimento di Fisica, Università di GenovaM. BresciaDepartment of Physics “E. Pancini”, University Federico IIS. CameraINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoG Cañas-HerreraEuropean Space Agency/ESTECV. CapobiancoINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoChris CarboneINAF-IASF MilanoV. F. CardoneINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaJ. CarreteroCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)Santiago CasasInstitute for Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology (TTK), RWTH Aachen UniversityF. J. CastanderInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Edifici RDIT, Campus UPCM. CastellanoNational Institute for AstrophysicsG. CastignaniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. CavuotiINFN section of NaplesK. C. ChambersInstitute for Astronomy, University of HawaiiA. CimattiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaC Colodro-CondeInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasG. CongedoInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford HillL. ConversiEuropean Space Research InstituteY. CopinCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueF. CourbinInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA)H. M. CourtoisCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueA. Da SilvaDepartamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Edifício C8, Campo GrandeH. DegaudenziDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaS. de la TorreAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMG. De LuciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteH. DoleUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut d’astrophysique spatialeF. DubathDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaC. A. J. DuncanUK Astronomy Technology CentreX DupacESAC/ESAS. DusiniINFN-PadovaS. EscoffierCentre de physique des particules de MarseilleMarcelo FarinaINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiR FarinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. FarrensUniversité Paris CitéS FerriolUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822F. Finelli⋆INFN-BolognaP. FosalbaInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Edifici RDIT, Campus UPCM. FrailisINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteE. FranceschiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. GaleottaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteKoshy GeorgeB. GillisInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford HillC. GiocoliINFN-Sezione di BolognaJ. Gracia-CarpioMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsA. GrazianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaF GruppMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsS. V. H. HauganInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of OsloHenk HoekstraLeiden Observatory, Leiden UniversityW. HolmesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyF. HormuthFelix Hormuth EngineeringA. HornstrupTechnical University of DenmarkK. JahnkęMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieM. JhabvalaNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterE. KeihänenS. KermicheAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMA. KiesslingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyM. KilbingerUniversité Paris-SaclayB. KubikInstitut de Physique des 2 Infinis de LyonM KümmelUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenM. KunzUniversité de Genève, Département de Physique Théorique and Centre for Astroparticle PhysicsH. Kurki‐SuonioDepartment of PhysicsA. M. C. Le BrunUniversité Paris Sciences et LettresS. LigoriINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoP. B. LiljeInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of OsloV. LindholmDepartment of PhysicsI. LloroSKAO, Jodrell Bank, Lower WithingtonG. MainettiCentre de Calcul de l’IN2P3/CNRSD. MainoDipartimento di Fisica "Aldo Pontremoli", Università degli Studi di MilanoE. MaioranoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaO. MansuttiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteS. MarcinUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Northwestern Switzerland, School of Computer ScienceO. MarggrafUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für AstronomieM. MartinelliINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaN. MartinetAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMF. MarulliINFN-Sezione di BolognaR. MasseyS. MaurogordatoUniversité Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, Bd de l’Observatoire, CS 34229E. MedinaceliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. MeiCNRS-UCB International Research Laboratory, Centre Pierre Binétruy, IRL2007, CPB-IN2P3Y MellierInstitut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR 7095, CNRS, and Sorbonne UniversitéM. MeneghettiINFN-Sezione di BolognaE. MerlinINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaG. MeylanInstitute of Physics, Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Observatoire de SauvernyA. MoraTelespazio UK S.L. for European Space Agency (ESA)M. MorescoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna
2026en
ABI

Annotatsiya

We model intrinsic alignment (IA) in Euclid ’s Flagship simulation to investigate its impact on Euclid ’s weak lensing signal. Our IA implementation in the Flagship simulation takes the photometric properties of galaxies into account, along with their dark matter host halos. The simulation parameters are calibrated using combined constraints from observations and cosmological hydrodynamical simulations. We compare simulations against theory predictions, determining the parameters of two of the most widely used IA models: the nonlinear alignment (NLA) and the tidal alignment and tidal torquing (TATT) models. We measured the amplitude of the simulated IA signal as a function of galaxy magnitude and colour in the redshift range 0.1 < z < 2.1, close that of Euclid ’s main galaxy sample. We find that both NLA and TATT are able to accurately describe the IA signal in the simulation down to scales of 6–7 h −1 Mpc. We measured the alignment amplitudes for red galaxies that are comparable to those of the observations, using samples that had not been used in the initial calibration procedure. For blue galaxies, our constraints are consistent with zero alignments in our first redshift bin 0.1 < z < 0.3, but we detected a non-negligible signal at higher redshift; however, this signal is consistent with the upper limits set by observational constraints. Additionally, several hydrodynamical simulations have predicted alignments for spiral galaxies, in agreement with our findings. Finally, the evolution of alignment with redshift is realistic and comparable to what has been determined based on observations. However, we find that the commonly adopted redshift power law for IA fails to reproduce the simulation alignments above z = 1.1. A significantly improved agreement can be obtained when the luminosity dependence is included, capturing the intrinsic luminosity evolution with redshift in magnitude-limited surveys. We conclude that the Flagship IA simulation is a useful tool for translating current IA constraints into predictions for IA contamination of Euclid -like samples.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar