Maqola

The quest for a globally comprehensible Russula language

Slavomír AdamčíkInstitute of Botany, Plant Science and Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 23, Bratislava, SlovakiaBrian P. LooneyDepartment of Biology, Duke University, 130 Science Drive, Durham, NC, 27708-0338, USAMiroslav CaboňInstitute of Botany, Plant Science and Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 23, Bratislava, SlovakiaSoňa JančovičováDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius, University in Bratislava, Révová 39, 811 02, Bratislava, SlovakiaKatarína AdamčíkováDepartment of Plant Pathology and Mycology, Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences Zvolen, Akademická 2, 949 01, Nitra, SlovakiaPeter G. AvisIndiana University Northwest, 3400 Broadway, Marram Hall, Room 308, Gary, IN, 46408, USAMagdalena BarajasIndiana University Northwest, 3400 Broadway, Marram Hall, Room 308, Gary, IN, 46408, USAR. P. BhattDepartment of Botany & Microbiology, H.N.B. Garhwal University, Garhwal, Srinagar, 246174, Uttarakhand, IndiaAdriana CorralesPrograma de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Cr. 24 # 63C-69, Bogotá, D.C., ColombiaKanad DasA.J.C. Bose Indian Botanic Garden, Botanical Survey of India, P.O. Botanic Garden, Howrah, 711103, IndiaFelix HampeAniket GhoshDepartment of Botany & Microbiology, H.N.B. Garhwal University, Garhwal, Srinagar, 246174, Uttarakhand, IndiaGenevieve GatesTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, Private Bag 98, Hobart, TAS, 7001, AustraliaVille KälviäinenAbdul Nasir KhalidDepartment of Botany, University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore, 54590, PakistanMunazza KiranDepartment of Botany, University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore, 54590, PakistanR. D. LangeDepartment of Biology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000, Ghent, BelgiumHyun LeeSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South KoreaYoung Woon LimSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South KoreaAlejandro KongCentro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Biológicas, Km. 10.5 Carretera San Martín Texmelucan-Tlaxcala, CP. 90120, Ixtacuixtla, Tlaxcala, MexicoCathrin ManzDepartment of Mycology, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Biologicum, Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyClark L. OvreboDepartment of Biology, University of Central Oklahoma, 100. N. University Drive, Box 89, Edmond, OK, 73034, USAMalka SabaDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, PakistanTero TaipaleAnnemieke VerbekenDepartment of Biology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000, Ghent, BelgiumKomsit WisitrassameewongSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South KoreaBart BuyckInstitut de Systématique, Ecologie et Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 39, 75005, Paris, France

2019en

ABI

Annotatsiya

Since 2007, the quality of Russula descriptions has improved and the use of molecular support for species delimitation and the number of published new species has increased. However, the description style is not consistent and has regional or author-specific patterns. Most recent publications still favour descriptions of spores compared to hymenium and pileipellis elements, and usually only the spore size is provided with statistical support. This study proposes standards for descriptions of the microscopic structure of Russula species (Russulaceae, Agaricomycetes). We present the description template, the template measurements table, the specific terminology and the essential chemical reagents. The proposed standards were tested by mycologists from 11 countries who met at the Russula Microscopy Workshop in Slovakia. Descriptions of 26 species from 9 countries and four continents were prepared, among them R. amarissima, R. castanopsidis, R. seperina and R. subtilis are re-described and 15 species are introduced as new: R. abietiphila, R. amerorecondita, R. aurantioflava, R. echidna, R. flavobrunnescens, R. fluvialis, R. fortunae, R. garyensis, R. gemmata, R. laevis, R. madrensis, R. olivaceohimalayensis, R. purpureogracilis, R. sancti-pauli and R. wielangtae. Seven descriptions for candidate new species are provided without a formal name assignment. Pairwise comparison of species described in this study with available similar descriptions of related species suggests that microscopic characters from all parts of the basidiomata can be equally important for species recognition and they deserve the same treatment including number of measurements and statistics. The majority of recent studies does not recognise differences between the pileus margin and centre, but more than one-third of the species described in this study show distinct differences between the pileus areas, emphasizing the importance to specify the origin of pileipellis observations. This study proved that there is frequently insufficient difference in the ITS barcode between closely related species and that it is necessary to use more genetic markers combined with ecological and geographical data.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

DOI: 10.1007/s13225-019-00437-2

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

4 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba

Koʻrsatkichlar — AkademScholar