Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
AkademIndex

Mahsulotlar

Ishlab chiquvchilar uchun

AkademBaseEkotizim uchun ochiq API
Maqola

Transfer Learning-Based Automatic Hurricane Damage Detection Using Satellite Images

Swapandeep KaurChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab 140401, IndiaSheifali GuptaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab 140401, IndiaSwati SinghDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, University Institute of Technology, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla 171005, IndiaVinh Truong HoangFaculty of Computer Science, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, VietnamSultan AlmakdiCollege of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, Najran 61441, Saudi ArabiaTurki AlelyaniCollege of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, Najran 61441, Saudi ArabiaAsadullah ShaikhCollege of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia
2022en
ABI

Annotatsiya

After the occurrence of a hurricane, assessing damage is extremely important for the emergency managers so that relief aid could be provided to afflicted people. One method of assessing the damage is to determine the damaged and the undamaged buildings post-hurricane. Normally, damage assessment is performed by conducting ground surveys, which are time-consuming and involve immense effort. In this paper, transfer learning techniques have been used for determining damaged and undamaged buildings in post-hurricane satellite images. Four different transfer learning techniques, which include VGG16, MobileNetV2, InceptionV3 and DenseNet121, have been applied to 23,000 Hurricane Harvey satellite images, which occurred in the Texas region. A comparative analysis of these models has been performed on the basis of the number of epochs and the optimizers used. The performance of the VGG16 pre-trained model was better than the other models and achieved an accuracy of 0.75, precision of 0.74, recall of 0.95 and F1-score of 0.83 when the Adam optimizer was used. When the comparison of the best performing models was performed in terms of various optimizers, VGG16 produced the best accuracy of 0.78 for the RMSprop optimizer.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

2 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba