Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
AkademIndex

Mahsulotlar

Ishlab chiquvchilar uchun

AkademBaseEkotizim uchun ochiq API
Maqola

Pollen morphology in Rubus (Rosaceae) and its taxonomic implications

Xian‐Hua XiongChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, ChinaXin‐Mao ZhouSchool of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, ChinaMeng LiCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, ChinaBo XuChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, ChinaHeng‐Ning DengChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, ChinaQi YuChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, ChinaXin‐Fen GaoChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, China
2019en
ABI

Annotatsiya

Rubus is one of the most species-rich and most taxonomically challenging genera in Rosaceae. Pollen morphology of Rubus species has been described by many researchers but never in a comprehensive study. In this study, pollen morphology of 155 species and 13 varieties representing all 12 subgenera of Rubus was examined using scanning electron microscope to investigate whether pollen characters can help elucidate the challenging taxonomy in this genus. The results showed that the pollen grains of studied Rubus species are tricolporate, and pollen shape varies from suboblate, spheroidal, subprolate and prolate to perprolate. Exine ornamentation of examined pollen grains can be divided into six types and three subtypes. The pollen cluster analysis tree, which was performed using nine pollen characters, does not agree well with the traditional macromorphological classification and molecular phylogenetic trees based on DNA fragments. Except for subg. Chamaemorus and subg. Comaropsis, pollen morphology seems difficult to distinguish at subgeneric or sectional level, and consequently it lacks significant taxonomic value at these levels. Pollen morphology may not be considered a diagnostic feature for the division of subgenera and sections in Rubus. Though pollen morphology alone is not sufficient to elucidate or reconstruct the taxonomic relationships within Rubus, it can provide some useful information for the taxonomic treatment at specific level.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

2 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba