A DNA barcode for land plants
CBOL Plant Working Group1Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Peter M. HollingsworthRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Laura L. ForrestRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;John L. SpougeNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Computational Biology Branch, Bethesda, MD 20894;Mehrdad HajibabaeiBiodiversity Institute of Ontario, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Sujeevan RatnasinghamBiodiversity Institute of Ontario, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Michelle van der BankDepartment of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa;Mark W. ChaseRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, United Kingdom;Robyn S. CowanRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, United Kingdom;David L. EricksonDepartment of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, 20013-7012;Aron J. FazekasDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Sean W. GrahamUBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, and Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4;Karen E. JamesBotany Department, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom;Ki-Joong KimSchool of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea;W. John KressDepartment of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, 20013-7012;Harald SchneiderBotany Department, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom;Jonathan Van Alphen-StahlRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, United Kingdom;Spencer C. H. BarrettDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B2;Cássio van den BergLaboratório de Sistemática Molecular de Plantas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, 44031-460, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil;Diego BogarínJardín Botánico Lankester, Universidad de Costa Rica, Cartago, Costa Rica;Kevin S. BurgessDepartment of Biology, Columbus State University, Columbus, GA 31907-5645;Kenneth M. CameronDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53508;Mark A. CarineBotany Department, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom;Juliana ChacónUniversidad de los Andes, Apartado Aéreo 4976, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia;Alexandra ClarkRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;James J. ClarksonRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, United Kingdom;Ferozah ConradLeslie Hill Molecular Systematics Laboratory, SANBI, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Claremont 7735, Cape Town, South Africa;Dion S. DeveyRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, United Kingdom;C. S. FordInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion SY23 3DA, United Kingdom;Terry A. HeddersonDepartment of Botany, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa;Michelle L. HollingsworthRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Brian C. HusbandDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Laura J. KellyRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Prasad KesanakurtiDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Jung Sung KimSchool of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea;Young‐Dong KimDepartment of Life Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon 200-702, Korea;Renaud LahayeDepartment of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa;Hae-Lim LeeSchool of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea;David G. LongRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Santiago MadriñánUniversidad de los Andes, Apartado Aéreo 4976, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia;Olivier MaurinDepartment of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa;Isabelle MeusnierBiodiversity Institute of Ontario, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Steven G. NewmasterDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Chong-Wook ParkSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea;Diana M. PercyUBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, and Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4;Gitte PetersenNatural History Museum AarhusJames RichardsonRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Gerardo A. SalazarInstituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 México, D.F., Mexico;Vincent SavolainenImperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom; andOle SebergNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark;M. J. WilkinsonInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion SY23 3DA, United Kingdom;Dong‐Keun YiSchool of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea;Damon P. LittleCullman Program for Molecular Systematics, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, 10458-5126
2009en
ABI
Annotatsiya
DNA barcoding involves sequencing a standard region of DNA as a tool for species identification. However, there has been no agreement on which region(s) should be used for barcoding land plants. To provide a community recommendation on a standard plant barcode, we have compared the performance of 7 leading candidate plastid DNA regions (atpF-atpH spacer, matK gene, rbcL gene, rpoB gene, rpoC1 gene, psbK-psbI spacer, and trnH-psbA spacer). Based on assessments of recoverability, sequence quality, and levels of species discrimination, we recommend the 2-locus combination of rbcL+matK as the plant barcode. This core 2-locus barcode will provide a universal framework for the routine use of DNA sequence data to identify specimens and contribute toward the discovery of overlooked species of land plants.
Hali tarjima qilinmagan
Identifikatorlar
Iqtiboslar va manbalar
5 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba