Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
AkademIndex

Mahsulotlar

Ishlab chiquvchilar uchun

AkademBaseEkotizim uchun ochiq API
Maqola

Multiple molecular evidences for a living mammalian fossil

Dorothée HuchonDepartment of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel;Pascale ChevretDepartment of Paleontology, Phylogeny, and Paleobiology, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, cc064, Université Montpellier II, Place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France;Ursula JordanInstitute of Experimental Pathology, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany;C. William KilpatrickDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405-0086; andVincent RanwezDepartment of Paleontology, Phylogeny, and Paleobiology, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, cc064, Université Montpellier II, Place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France;Paulina D. JenkinsDepartment of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United KingdomJürgen BrosiusInstitute of Experimental Pathology, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany;Jürgen SchmitzInstitute of Experimental Pathology, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany;
2007en
ABI

Annotatsiya

Laonastes aenigmamus is an enigmatic rodent first described in 2005. Molecular and morphological data suggested that it is the sole representative of a new mammalian family, the Laonastidae, and a member of the Hystricognathi. However, the validity of this family is controversial because fossil-based phylogenetic analyses suggest that Laonastes is a surviving member of the Diatomyidae, a family considered to have been extinct for 11 million years. According to these data, Laonastes and Diatomyidae are the sister clade of extant Ctenodactylidae (i.e., gundies) and do not belong to the Hystricognathi. To solve the phylogenetic position of Laonastes, we conducted a large-scale molecular phylogeny of rodents. The analysis includes representatives of all major rodent taxonomic groups and was based on 5.5 kb of sequence data from four nuclear and two mitochondrial genes. To further validate the obtained results, a short interspersed element insertion analysis including 11 informative loci was also performed. Our molecular data based on sequence and short interspersed element analyses unambiguously placed Laonastes as a sister clade of gundies. All alternative hypotheses were significantly rejected based on Shimodaira-Hasegawa tests, supporting the idea that Laonastes does not belong to the Hystricognathi. Molecular dating analysis also supports an ancient divergence, approximately 44 Mya ago, between Ctenodactylidae and Laonastes. These combined analyses support the hypothesis that Laonastes is indeed a living fossil. Protection of this surviving species would conserve an ancient mammalian family.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

5 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba