Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
AkademIndex

Mahsulotlar

Ishlab chiquvchilar uchun

AkademBaseEkotizim uchun ochiq API
Maqola

Cottonseed with a High (+)- to (−)-Gossypol Enantiomer Ratio Favorable to Broiler Production

Christopher A. BaileyDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas 77843-2472; Cotton Pathology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2765 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845; Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845-9594; Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University,Robert D. StipanovicDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas 77843-2472; Cotton Pathology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2765 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845; Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845-9594; Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University,Michael S. ZiehrDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas 77843-2472; Cotton Pathology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2765 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845; Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845-9594; Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University,Akram U. HaqDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas 77843-2472; Cotton Pathology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2765 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845; Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845-9594; Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University,M. H. A. SattarDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas 77843-2472; Cotton Pathology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2765 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845; Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845-9594; Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University,L.F. KubenaDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas 77843-2472; Cotton Pathology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2765 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845; Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845-9594; Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University,H. KimDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas 77843-2472; Cotton Pathology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2765 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845; Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845-9594; Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University,Robson de Macêdo VieiraDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas 77843-2472; Cotton Pathology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2765 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845; Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845-9594; Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University,
2000en
ABI

Annotatsiya

This study was designed to evaluate the relative toxicity of (+)- and (-)-gossypol enantiomers in 0-3-week-old broilers. Treatments consisted of broiler starter diets formulated with either a glandless, which did not contain gossypol, a commercial glanded [62. 2% (+)-gossypol], or a glanded moco [83.2% (+)-gossypol] crushed cottonseed (CCS) (six replicates/treatment) plus a soybean meal negative control. Glandless cottonseed was mixed with the moco cottonseed (2.4% free gossypol) so that both the commercial glanded and moco glanded cottonseeds contained equivalent concentrations of free gossypol (2.0%). The cottonseed treatments were added at 5 and 10% of the diet. Body weights and feed conversions were determined weekly. Body weights and feed-to-gain ratios of broilers fed 5 and 10% glandless CCS and 5% moco CCS were not significantly different. Broilers receiving 10% commercial glanded CCS weighed significantly less than those subjected to all other treatments. Feed-to-gain ratios were significantly higher for broilers receiving 10% commercial glanded and 10% moco CCS as compared to 5% moco and glandless CCS, 10% glandless CCS, and control. Relative liver weights of birds receiving 10% moco CCS were significantly less than those of birds receiving 10% commercial CCS. The data clearly showed that broilers fed moco CCS containing a relatively high (+)- to (-)-gossypol enantiomer ratio performed better than broilers receiving commercial CCS with a lower (+)- to (-)-gossypol enantiomer ratio.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

2 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba