Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
AkademIndex

Mahsulotlar

Ishlab chiquvchilar uchun

AkademBaseEkotizim uchun ochiq API
Maqola

Preoperative donor liver biopsy for adult living donor liver transplantation: Risks and benefits

Silvio NadalinDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Essen, Germany. [email protected]Massimo MalagóDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Essen, GermanyC Valentín-GamazoDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Essen, GermanyGiuliano TestaDivision of Transplantation, University of Illinois, Chicago, ILHideo A. BabaInstitute of Pathology, University of Essen, GermanyChao LiuDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Essen, GermanyNils R. FrühaufDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Essen, GermanyRandolph SchafferDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Essen, GermanyGuido GerkenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Essen, GermanyAndrea FrillingDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Essen, GermanyChristoph E. BroelschDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Essen, Germany
2005en
ABI

Annotatsiya

The role of liver biopsy (LB) in donor selection for adult living donor liver transplantation remains controversial, since the procedure is associated with additional potential risks for the donor. From April 1998 to August 2004, 730 potential living donors for 337 adult recipients underwent our multistep evaluation program. In 144 candidates, LB was performed. LB was obtained in a percutaneous ultrasound-guided fashion by means of Menghini needle (32 cases) or Tru-cut needle (112 cases). The biopsy specimen was preserved in 5% formalin and processed with hematoxylin & eosin-stained sections. Thirty-one (21%) of 144 candidates who underwent an LB had a positive finding at histological examination that induced their exclusion from donation, of whom 21 had liver steatosis of varying kind and grade (10%-80%) and 10 had a nonsteatotic hepatopathy (non-A-D hepatitis in 6 cases, diffuse granulomatosis in 2, schistosomiasis in 1, fibrosis in 1). The only observed major complications related to LB were 2 intraparenchymal haematomas, both of which resolved spontaneously within a few months. In conclusion, based on these findings, we believe that preoperative LB in the donor selection for adult LDLT is necessary, once the initial donor screening and noninvasive evaluation is complete. Because other screening modalities can be unreliable, without preoperative LB a fraction of potential donors will be operated on inappropriately, risking both donor and recipient. The main objective of LB should be to ensure the donor's safety more than the preservation of the graft function.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

2 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba