Skip to main content
AkademIndex

Products

For developers

AkademBasesoonOpen API for the ecosystem
Latin
English
Article

Inclusive <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> production in collisions of pions with protons and nuclei in the second resonance region of baryons

R. Abou YassineInstitut für KernphysikJ. Adamczewski-MuschGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHO. ArnoldExcellence Cluster ‘Origin and Structure of the Universe’E. T. AtomssaLaboratoire de Physique des 2 infinis Irene Joliot-CurieM. BeckerC. BehnkeInstitut für KernphysikJ. C. Berger-ChenExcellence Cluster ‘Origin and Structure of the Universe’A. BlancoLIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de PartículasC. BlumeGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHM. BöhmerPhysik Department E62L. ChladNuclear Physics InstituteP. ChudobaNuclear Physics InstituteI. CiepałS. DebLaboratoire de Physique des 2 infinis Irene Joliot-CurieC. DeveauxD. DittertInstitut für KernphysikJ. DreyerE. EppleExcellence Cluster ‘Origin and Structure of the Universe’L. FabbiettiPhysik Department E62P. FonteLIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de PartículasC. FrancoLIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de PartículasJ. FriesePhysik Department E62I. FröhlichInstitut für KernphysikJ. FörtschBergische Universität WuppertalT. GalatyukGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHJ. A. GarzónR. GernhäuserPhysik Department E62R. GreifenhagenM. GrunwaldWarsaw University of TechnologyM. GumberidzeGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHS. HarabaszInstitut für KernphysikT. HeinzGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHT. HenninoLaboratoire de Physique des 2 infinis Irene Joliot-CurieC. HöhneGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHF. HojeijLaboratoire de Physique des 2 infinis Irene Joliot-CurieR. HolzmannGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHM. IdzikAGH University of KrakowB. KämpferK.‐H. KampertBergische Universität WuppertalB. KardanInstitut für KernphysikV. KedychInstitut für KernphysikI. KöenigGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHWolfgang KöenigGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHM. KohlsInstitut für KernphysikJ. KolasWarsaw University of TechnologyB. W. KolbGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHG. KorcylSmoluchowski Institute of PhysicsG. KornakovWarsaw University of TechnologyR. KotteW. KruegerInstitut für KernphysikA. KuglerNuclear Physics InstituteT. KunzPhysik Department E62R. LalikSmoluchowski Institute of PhysicsK. LapidusExcellence Cluster ‘Origin and Structure of the Universe’S. LinevGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHF. LinzGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHL. LopesLIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de PartículasM. LorenzInstitut für KernphysikT. MahmoudL. MaierPhysik Department E62A. MaligeSmoluchowski Institute of PhysicsJ. MarkertGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHS. MaurusPhysik Department E62V. MetagJ. MichelInstitut für KernphysikD. M. MihaylovExcellence Cluster ‘Origin and Structure of the Universe’V. MikhaylovNuclear Physics InstituteA. MolendaAGH University of KrakowC. MüntzInstitut für KernphysikR. MünzerExcellence Cluster ‘Origin and Structure of the Universe’M. NabrothInstitut für KernphysikL. NaumannK. NowakowskiSmoluchowski Institute of PhysicsJ. OrlińskiUniwersytet Warszawski - Instytut Fizyki DoświadczalnejJ.–H. OttoY. ParpottasM. ParschauInstitut für KernphysikC. PaulyBergische Universität WuppertalV. PechenovGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHO. PechenovaGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHK. PiaseckiUniwersytet Warszawski - Instytut Fizyki DoświadczalnejJ. PietraszkoGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHT. PovarBergische Universität WuppertalK. ProścińskiSmoluchowski Institute of PhysicsA. ProzorovNuclear Physics InstituteWitold Wojciech PrzygodaSmoluchowski Institute of PhysicsK. PyszB. RamsteinLaboratoire de Physique des 2 infinis Irene Joliot-CurieN. RathodWarsaw University of TechnologyP. Rodríguez-RamosNuclear Physics InstituteA. RostGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHA. RustamovGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHP. SalaburaSmoluchowski Institute of PhysicsT. ScheibInstitut für KernphysikNiklas SchildInstitut für KernphysikK. R. Schmidt-SommerfeldPhysik Department E62H. SchuldesInstitut für KernphysikE. SchwabGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbHF. ScozziInstitut für KernphysikF. SeckInstitut für Kernphysik
Physical review. Cjournal2025lv
ABI

Abstract

Inclusive ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ production has been studied with HADES in ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}+p, {\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}} +$ C, and ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}+{\mathrm{CH}}_{2}$ reactions, using the GSI pion beam at $\sqrt{{s}_{\ensuremath{\pi}p}}=1.49$ GeV. Invariant mass and transverse momentum distributions have been measured and reveal contributions from Dalitz decays of ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}, \ensuremath{\eta}$ mesons, and baryon resonances. The transverse momentum distributions are very sensitive to the underlying kinematics of the various processes. The baryon contribution exhibits a deviation up to a factor seven from the QED reference expected for the dielectron decay of a hypothetical pointlike baryon with the production cross section constrained from the inverse $\ensuremath{\gamma}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}n\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}p$ reaction. The enhancement is attributed to a strong four-momentum squared dependence of the timelike electromagnetic transition form factors as suggested by vector meson dominance (VMD). Two versions of the VMD that differ in the photon-baryon coupling have been applied in simulations and compared to data. VMD1 (or two-component VMD) assumes a coupling via the $\ensuremath{\rho}$ meson and a direct coupling of the photon, while in VMD2 (or strict VMD) the coupling is only mediated via the $\ensuremath{\rho}$ meson. The VMD2 model, frequently used in transport calculations for dilepton decays, is found to overestimate the measured dielectron yields, while a good description of the data can be obtained with the VMD1 model assuming no phase difference between the two amplitudes. Similar descriptions have also been obtained using a timelike baryon transition form factor model where the pion cloud plays the major role.

Topics

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 033 references
Metrics — AkademScholar · Coming soon