Skip to main content
AkademIndex

Products

For developers

AkademBasesoonOpen API for the ecosystem
Latin
English
Article

DESI DR2 Results I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest

DESI CollaborationIRFU, SaclayMunawar KarimAguilar, J.Boston UAhlen, S.Laguna U., TenerifeC. Allende PrietoU. Michigan, Ann ArborAlves, O.Abhijeet AnandU. Michigan, Ann ArborU. AndradeIRFU, SaclayArmengaud, E.UNAM, CCFAviles, A.Bailey, S.A. BaultJayashree BeheraRochester US. BenZviMilan UDavide BianchiSwinburne U., Ctr. Astrophys. SupercomputChris BlakeA. BrodzellerUniversity Coll. LondonDavid BrooksFermilabE. Buckley‐GeerIRFU, SaclayE. BurtinR. CalderónPortsmouth U., ICGR. E. A. CanningIAC, La LagunaA. Carnero RosellEdinburgh U., Inst. AstronP. CarrilhoBarcelona, IFAELidia CasasBarcelona, IEECF. J. CastanderSussex UR. CereskaiteOhio State UM. CharlesE. ChaussidonBarcelona, IFAEJ. Chaves-MonteroIRFU, SaclayD. ChebatT. ClaybaughDurham U., ICCS. ColeTaiwan, Natl. Tsing Hua UAndrew P. CooperAndrei CuceuK. S. DawsonRoger de BelsunceUNAM, MexicoAxel de la MacorraIRFU, SaclayArnaud de MattiaMadrid, CIEMATN. DeiossoNatl. Solar Observ., TucsonJ. Della CostaNatl. Solar Observ., TucsonArjun DeyPittsburgh UBiprateep DeyZ. DingUniversity Coll. LondonP. DoelUC, Berkeley, Math. DeptJ. EdelsteinHarvard-Smithsonian Ctr. AstrophysDaniel J. EisensteinDurham U., ICCWillem ElbersNatl. Solar Observ., TucsonParker FagreliusKIPAC, Menlo ParkK. FanningLBL, BerkeleyS. FerraroBarcelona, IFAEAndreu Font-RiberaJ. E. Forero-RomeroC. García-QuinteroFermilabLehman H. GarrisonICE, BellaterraE. GaztañagaICC, Barcelona UHéctor Gil-MarínSatya Gontcho A GontchoGuanajuato UA. X. Gonzalez-MoralesBarcelona, IFAEC. GordonUC, IrvineD. GreenFermilabG. GutierrezJ. GuyClemson UChang Hoon HahnOhio State UM. HerboldIRFU, SaclayH. K. Herrera-AlcantarKEK, TsukubaHo, M. -F.Chicago U., KICPK. HonscheidQueensland UCullan HowlettMichigan UDragan HutererMustapha IshakNatl. Solar Observ., TucsonS. JuneauOhio State UNaim Göksel KaraçaylıSouthern Methodist US. KentUC, IrvineD. KirkbyTheodore KisnerLaguna U., TenerifeKitaura, F. -S.Cambridge U., Inst. of AstronS. E. KoposovKremin, A.University Coll. LondonO. LahavHarvard-Smithsonian Ctr. AstrophysC. LammanMartin LandriauPerimeter Inst. Theor. PhysDustin LangNew York U., Courant InstJ. LaskerIRFU, SaclayGoff, J. M. LeLPNHE, ParisGuillou, L. LeLick ObservAlexie LeauthaudM. E. LeviQiong LiToronto U., Astron. DeptTing S. LiKASI, DaeJeonK. LodhaBarcelona, IFAEMartine LokkenIRFU, SaclayC. MagnevilleBarcelona, Autonoma UMarc ManeraOhio State U., Dept. AstronPaul MartiniKASI, DaeJeonWilliam L. MatthewsonPatrick McDonaldNatl. Solar Observ., TucsonAaron MeisnerLPSC, GrenobleJ. Mena-FernándezICREA, Barcelona
ArXiv.orgrepository2025en
ABI

Abstract

We present the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements with the Lyman-alpha (LyA) forest from the second data release (DR2) of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey. Our BAO measurements include both the auto-correlation of the LyA forest absorption observed in the spectra of high-redshift quasars and the cross-correlation of the absorption with the quasar positions. The total sample size is approximately a factor of two larger than the DR1 dataset, with forest measurements in over 820,000 quasar spectra and the positions of over 1.2 million quasars. We describe several significant improvements to our analysis in this paper, and two supporting papers describe improvements to the synthetic datasets that we use for validation and how we identify damped LyA absorbers. Our main result is that we have measured the BAO scale with a statistical precision of 1.1% along and 1.3% transverse to the line of sight, for a combined precision of 0.65% on the isotropic BAO scale at $z_{eff} = 2.33$. This excellent precision, combined with recent theoretical studies of the BAO shift due to nonlinear growth, motivated us to include a systematic error term in LyA BAO analysis for the first time. We measure the ratios $D_H(z_{eff})/r_d = 8.632 \pm 0.098 \pm 0.026$ and $D_M(z_{eff})/r_d = 38.99 \pm 0.52 \pm 0.12$, where $D_H = c/H(z)$ is the Hubble distance, $D_M$ is the transverse comoving distance, $r_d$ is the sound horizon at the drag epoch, and we quote both the statistical and the theoretical systematic uncertainty. The companion paper presents the BAO measurements at lower redshifts from the same dataset and the cosmological interpretation.

Topics

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 00 references
Metrics — AkademScholar · Coming soon