Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseскороОткрытый API экосистемы
Латиница
Русский
Препринт

Reinforcing Adherence to Lipid-lowering Therapy after an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Stefanos ZafeiropoulosElmezzi Graduate SchoolIoannis T. FarmakisAHEPA University HospitalΑναστάσιος ΚάρταςAHEPA University HospitalAlexandra ArvanitakiAHEPA University HospitalKonstantinos ArvanitakisAHEPA University HospitalVasileios NevrasAHEPA University HospitalAreti PagiantzaAHEPA University HospitalStavros ZanosAHEPA University HospitalGeorge GiannakoulasAHEPA University Hospital
Research Squarerepository2020en
ABI

Аннотация

Abstract Aims: Achieving the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a milestone often missed due to suboptimal adherence to secondary prevention treatments. Whether improved adherence could result in reduced LDL-C levels is unclear. We aimed to evaluate an educational-motivational intervention to increase long-term lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) adherence and LDL-C goal attainment rate among post-ACS patients. Methods: IDEAL-LDL was a parallel, two-arm, single-center, pragmatic, investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial. Hospitalized patients for ACS were randomized to a physician-led integrated intervention consisting of an educational session at baseline, followed by regular motivational interviewing phone sessions or usual care. Co-primary outcomes were the LLT adherence (measured by Proportion of Days Covered (PDC); good adherence defined as PDC>80%), and LDL-C goal (<70 mg/dl or 50% reduction from baseline) achievement rate at one year. Results: In total, 360 patients (mean age 62 years, 81% male) were randomized. Overall, good adherence was positively associated with LDL-C goal achievement rate at one year. Median PDC was higher in the intervention group than the control group [0.92 (IQR, 0.82–1.00) vs. 0.86 (0.62–0.98); p=0.03] while the intervention group had increased odds of good adherence (adjusted odds ratio: 1.76 (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 2.62; p=0.04). However, neither the rate of LDL-C goal achievement (49.6% in the intervention vs. 44.9% in the control group; p=0.49) nor clinical outcomes differed significantly between the two groups. Conclusion: Α multifaceted intervention improved LLT adherence in post-ACS patients without a significant difference in LDL-C goal attainment. (IDEAL-LDL, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02927808)

Темы

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Показатели — AkademScholar · Скоро