Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseскороОткрытый API экосистемы
Латиница
Русский
Препринт

Measuring Black Hole Spins through X-ray Reflection Spectroscopy and the Relativistic Precession Model: the case of XTE J1859+226

Gitika MallCenter for Field Theory and Particle Physics and Department of Physics, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, ChinaH. LiuCenter for Field Theory and Particle Physics and Department of Physics, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, ChinaCosimo BambiSchool of Natural Sciences and Humanities, New Uzbekistan University, Tashkent 100007, UzbekistanJames F. SteinerHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USAJavier A. GarcíaDr. Karl Remeis-Observatory and Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, D-96049 Bamberg, Germany
arXiv (Cornell University)repository2023en
ABI

Аннотация

The development of techniques to measure accurately black hole spins is crucial to study the physics and astrophysics of these objects. X-ray reflection spectroscopy is currently the most popular method to estimate the spins of accreting black holes; so far it has provided a spin measurement of about 40 stellar-mass black holes in X-ray binaries and 40 supermassive black holes in active galactic nuclei. The relativistic precession model (RPM) is another method to measure the spins of stellar-mass black holes: it requires the measurement of the frequencies of three simultaneous quasi-periodic oscillations and can potentially provide precise estimates of the black hole mass and spin. However, the two methods do not seem to provide consistent results when applied to the same sources, which questions the reliability and accuracy of these measurements. Recently, the RPM has been applied to infer the spin of the black hole in XTE J1859+226. The authors found $a_* = 0.149 \pm 0.005$ (68% CL). There are no other spin measurements of this source. We looked for archived RXTE observations of XTE J1859+226 with blurred reflection features and found 23 spectra suitable for measuring the spin. We employed two different models with relxill and relxillD and obtained a higher spin value from all these fits. From simultaneous fitting of 7 spectra of higher quality, we found $a_* = 0.986^{+0.001}_{-0.004}$ and $a_* =0.987 \pm 0.003$ (90% CL, statistical) with relxill and relxillD, respectively. Our results confirm the discrepancy between the spin measurements inferred from the two techniques.

Темы

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Показатели — AkademScholar · Скоро