Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model

Niklas K. SteffensSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia QLD 4072, AustraliaS. Alexander HaslamSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia QLD 4072, AustraliaStephen ReicherSchool of Psychology, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9JU, UKMichael J. PlatowSchool of Psychology, Australian National University, ACT 0200, AustraliaKatrien FransenDepartment of Kinesiology, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumJie YangResearch Center for Innovation and Strategic Human Resource Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, ChinaMichelle K. RyanFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, 9700 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsJolanda JettenSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia QLD 4072, AustraliaKim PetersSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia QLD 4072, AustraliaFilip BoenDepartment of Kinesiology, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
2014en
ABI

Аннотация

Although nearly two decades of research have provided support for the social identity approach to leadership, most previous work has focused on leaders' identity prototypicality while neglecting the assessment of other equally important dimensions of social identity management. However, recent theoretical developments have argued that in order to mobilize and direct followers' energies, leaders need not only to ‘be one of us’ (identity prototypicality), but also to ‘do it for us’ (identity advancement), to ‘craft a sense of us’ (identity entrepreneurship), and to ‘embed a sense of us’ (identity impresarioship). In the present research we develop and validate an Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) that assesses these dimensions in different contexts and with diverse samples from the US, China, and Belgium. Study 1 demonstrates that the scale has content validity such that the items meaningfully differentiate between the four dimensions. Studies 2, 3, and 4 provide evidence for the scale's construct validity (distinguishing between dimensions), discriminant validity (distinguishing identity leadership from authentic leadership, leaders' charisma, and perceived leader quality), and criterion validity (relating the ILI to key leadership outcomes). We conclude that by assessing multiple facets of leaders' social identity management the ILI has significant utility for both theory and practice.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 3Использованных источников: 0